๐Ÿ“‹ Case Study

Aerospace Titanium Bracket Production Optimization

Excessive tool wear and inconsistent surface finish causing 22% scrap rate

๐Ÿ—๏ธ Project Overview

High-volume production of Ti-6Al-4V structural brackets for commercial aircraft

๐ŸŽฏ Challenge

Excessive tool wear and inconsistent surface finish causing 22% scrap rate

๐Ÿ”ง Design Approach

Adaptive roughing + trochoidal finishing with MQL delivery; revised toolpath segmentation and stepover reduction

๐Ÿ“ Design Diagram

Aerospace Titanium Bracket Production OptimizationCNC MachiningAdaptive RoughingTrochoidal FinishingChallenge22% scrap rateTool wear & finish inconsistencySolutionAdaptive + TrochoidalMQL delivery โ€ข Stepover โ†“Optimal Chip Load0.045 mm/toothThermal Load Index1.8 (target โ‰ค 2.0)

AI-generated project design illustration

๐Ÿ“ Key Calculations

Optimal Chip Load

0.003 ร— Tool Diameter
Result: 0.045 mm/tooth
Prevents built-up edge on titanium

Thermal Load Index

SFM ร— DOC ร— WOC / Coolant Flow
Result: 1.8
Below threshold of 2.0 indicates safe thermal envelope

๐Ÿ“Š Results

Tool life increased 3.2ร—, surface finish improved from Ra 3.2 ยตm to Ra 0.8 ยตm, scrap reduced to 4.1%

๐Ÿ’ก Lessons Learned

  • โ€ขTitanium requires low chip load AND high spindle speed synergy
  • โ€ขMQL flow rate must be calibrated per tool geometry

โœ… Key Takeaways

  • 1Titanium requires low chip load AND high spindle speed synergy
  • 2MQL flow rate must be calibrated per tool geometry

๐Ÿ”— Engineering Applications

See how this applies across industries

Contact Us

  • ๐Ÿ“ Weifang City, Shandong Province, China
  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ WhatsApp: +86 150 1018 9173
  • โš™ Cedar Li
  • โœ‰๏ธ Cedar@innovchip.net
Copyright ยฉ 2026 ToolFusion. All rights reserved. Powered by Manufacturing Tech
ยฉ ToolFusion Engineering โ€” All Rights Reserved Editorial Policy Review Process Reference Standards Updated: 2026-07-20 Reviewed by: ToolFusion Engineering Team